comparison

Roxa vs Arenadata Streaming

Arenadata Streaming and Platform V Corax are serious enterprise Kafka distributions for large IT: clusters, rollout projects, an annual subscription. Roxa plays in a different league — where you need a reliable broker without a million-ruble budget and a support crew.

RoxaArenadata Streaming
What is insideAn original diskless broker (Rust), Kafka protocolAn Apache Kafka distribution (+NiFi etc.)
Payment modelPerpetual license + a year of updates includedAnnual subscription (license + support)
Price rangeCommunity — free; Pro — 150,000 ₽ per installationOn the order of a million ₽/year and up
DeploymentOne container / docker compose, minutesA cluster rollout, often a project
OperationsNo dedicated team requiredRequires Kafka cluster expertise
HA clusterIn development (reliability via S3 today)Yes, standard Kafka replication
Russian software registryNot yet (planned)Yes
Target customerTeams and mid-size businessLarge enterprise

The price reference is public: the entry edition of Arenadata Streaming (Lite, up to 32 cores) costs 990,000 ₽ per year — every year. A perpetual Roxa Pro license is 150,000 ₽ — less than two months of that subscription; after that you pay only for updates, and only if you need them.

an honest choice

When to pick Arenadata / Corax

Large enterprise: multi-node clusters under heavy load, an immediate Russian software registry requirement, vendor support with SLA and turnkey rollout, and a budget to match.

When to pick Roxa

You need a reliable Kafka-compatible broker on-prem without a cluster or a subscription: data in your S3, deployment in minutes, a perpetual license. When you grow into HA — the Enterprise edition is in development.